人不太上论坛，+QQ：261934956 注明来意，全部TB交易作者: 翼魂 时间: 2012-5-21 08:41
111111111111111作者: 翼魂 时间: 2012-5-28 09:17
顶顶顶顶顶顶顶作者: 翼魂 时间: 2012-5-30 08:20
继续顶顶顶顶作者: bearbear1017 时间: 2012-5-30 22:08
2900乌龟卡作者: 盈盈 时间: 2012-5-31 08:59
元0卡要吗？作者: 313opjaq 时间: 2012-6-6 12:50 标题: along the annihilate of the game ?it namely constantly said that women are the fairer sex. when making decisions that have a material or cash merit it namely also said that women share more affable than men. so when it comes to winning a prize lets say a huge bingo jackpot win,celine handbags,giuseppe zanotti shoes,celine bag,isabel marant, would women share so available plus whether so,giuseppe zanotti,giuseppe zanotti, who or what would they spend it aboard
economists assume that always individuals behave optimally,celine,celine,giuseppe zanotti flats, that is they use all information available apt them apt acquaint rational choices however,giuseppe zanotti sandals,giuseppe zanotti boots,while it comes to the opportunity of winning a prize such as a colossal competition cash win,celine bag,celine purse,celine purse, men and women behave change rational decision making so often tin fly out the window,isabel marant,barely mainly for whom?
consider research from the university of london which studied the action of contestants during a game show aired in the netherlands. the learn was undertaken to find what people’s motivations were when making decisions that inspire others as well as themselves when money was involved.
they diagnosed the action of the contestants who were taking part among a game show which,celine handbags,giuseppe zanotti sandals,along the annihilate of the game,celine handbags,giuseppe zanotti boots, two final contestants had a fussy decision apt make
the fussy decision was as each of the players to tell a decision if apt share or grab the huge sum of reward money. each player made his alternatively her decision without the other contestant knowing what the decision was. if either players chose apt share the amount they would every get half. if a player chose to share while their opponent chose apt catch the opponent received always the money. the crucial element was that if either players chose catch they would both kill up with nothing.